Spotify: A Scalable Growth Story

Spotify is the world’s leading audio streaming platform, connecting hundreds of millions of listeners with music, podcasts and audiobooks across nearly every country. What began as a simple music service has evolved into a global media platform built on personalization, discovery and creator tools, shaping how people find and consume audio content. As the company expands beyond music into broader formats while improving profitability after years of investment, it aims to balance growth with stronger financial returns. The question remains: Does this audio platform deserve a place in your portfolio?

This is not a financial advice. I am not a financial advisor and I only do these post in order to do my own analysis and elaborate about my decisions, especially for my copiers and followers. If you consider investing in any of the ideas I present, you should do your own research or contact a professional financial advisor, as all investing comes with a risk of losing money. You are also more than welcome to copy me. 

For full disclosure, I should mention that I do not own any shares in Spotify at the time of writing this analysis. If you would like to copy or view my portfolio, you can find instructions on how to do so here. If you want to purchase shares or fractional shares of Spotify, you can do so through eToro. eToro is a highly user-friendly platform that allows you to get started on investing with as little as $50.

The Business

Spotify is a global audio streaming platform that provides on demand access to music, podcasts, audiobooks and increasingly video across 184 countries. Since its launch in 2008, the company has reshaped the audio industry by moving consumption away from buying individual songs toward an access based subscription model built around unlimited streaming. The service operates a freemium structure consisting of a paid Premium tier and an ad supported free tier. Premium subscriptions represent the core revenue stream and provide predictable recurring income, while the free tier functions both as a monetization channel and as a conversion funnel that turns listeners into paying subscribers. By combining these two revenue sources, Spotify has been able to scale globally while maintaining improving unit economics. The platform had 751 million monthly active users and 290 million Premium subscribers at the end of 2025, and users collectively stream hundreds of billions of hours of content annually. Music remains the foundation of the service, but Spotify has expanded into podcasts, audiobooks, creator tools and advertising marketplaces to deepen engagement and improve monetization, since non music content carries structurally higher margins than licensed music streaming. The company is effectively building a two sided marketplace connecting listeners, creators, advertisers and rights holders. Creators gain distribution, analytics and monetization tools, while users benefit from discovery and personalization. Europe and North America remain the largest markets, but growth increasingly comes from Latin America and emerging regions as streaming adoption rises. Because the service works across thousands of devices and operating systems, it can expand globally without depending on any single hardware ecosystem. After many years focused primarily on growth, Spotify has reached a stage where its scale is beginning to translate into operating leverage and improving profitability. Spotify’s competitive moat is built less on exclusive content and more on scale, engagement and data. The company collects enormous amounts of listening data from hundreds of millions of users, which powers recommendation systems that personalize playlists and discovery. This creates a feedback loop in which better recommendations increase satisfaction, satisfaction increases engagement, and engagement generates more data that further improves recommendations. Over time the value of the service becomes the discovery experience rather than the catalog itself, making it difficult for smaller competitors to match. The platform also benefits from a two sided marketplace dynamic. Creators go where the audience is, listeners go where discovery works best and advertisers go where engagement is highest. As more listeners join, more creators distribute their content on Spotify, which broadens the content offering and further strengthens engagement. This reinforces the platform’s role as a standard distribution channel for the audio industry. Switching costs arise from user behavior rather than contracts. Years of listening history, personalized playlists and algorithmic recommendations create a personal music identity inside the platform, making it inconvenient for users to move to alternatives even if competing catalogs are similar. Spotify also chose ubiquity rather than ecosystem lock in, making the service available across phones, cars, speakers, televisions and game consoles regardless of manufacturer. This openness expands its addressable market and reduces dependence on any single technology ecosystem. The brand has become embedded in global culture, particularly among younger audiences, as social and personalized listening experiences reinforce engagement and organic growth. Combined with its scale, this improves advertising targeting, increases subscription conversion and spreads fixed costs across a large user base. As a result, scale increasingly supports profitability rather than just growth.

Management

Alex Nordström and Gustav Söderström serve as Co CEOs of Spotify, representing a leadership transition built largely from within the company rather than through external hires. Both executives have spent more than a decade at Spotify and were deeply involved in shaping the platform long before assuming the top role, which reflects founder Daniel Ek’s philosophy of promoting leaders who helped build the company rather than inheriting it. Daniel Ek remains Executive Chairman with a focus on long term strategy, while the two Co CEOs oversee day to day operations and execution. Alex Nordström joined Spotify in its early growth years and has held a wide range of operational and commercial leadership positions. Over time he became responsible for business operations, monetization and subscriber growth, including pricing, partnerships and market expansion. He played a central role in scaling the subscription model globally and adapting pricing structures across different regions and purchasing power levels, which has been important as Spotify expanded into emerging markets. His background combines strategy and execution, and he has been closely involved in turning Spotify from a fast growing product into a financially disciplined platform that balances growth with profitability. Internally he is known for emphasizing measurable outcomes, aligning targets across teams and ensuring that product initiatives translate into improvements in revenue, margins and user conversion. Gustav Söderström joined Spotify in 2009 and has been one of the most influential product leaders in the company’s history. As Chief Product and Technology leader before becoming Co CEO, he oversaw many of the platform’s defining innovations, including personalization systems, the recommendation engine, podcast integration and marketplace tools for creators. He was instrumental in integrating machine learning into the core user experience following Spotify’s acquisition of The Echo Nest, which became the foundation of the company’s discovery driven interface. His leadership has focused on long term technological advantages rather than short term features, positioning Spotify as a technology platform rather than just a media distributor. The two leaders operate jointly rather than dividing responsibilities into separate domains. Instead of running separate organizations, they manage a shared executive group that meets weekly to coordinate decisions across the entire company. This structure is designed to increase alignment and speed of execution by ensuring that the main decision layer collectively plans priorities and removes internal bottlenecks. They place particular emphasis on planning and synchronization, arguing that higher productivity tools and artificial intelligence increase the importance of clear direction rather than reducing it. Their approach aims to ensure that rapid product development remains coordinated with financial targets and long term strategy. Both Alex Nordström and Gustav Söderström reflect Spotify’s internal culture, which emphasizes trust, debate and iteration. Management encourages employees to challenge ideas openly and take risks while remaining aligned on long term goals. According to Daniel Ek, this culture has allowed Spotify to move quickly without losing direction and has been difficult for competitors to replicate. The Co CEOs were involved in nearly every major strategic shift in the company including the transition to mobile usage, subscription scaling, machine learning driven discovery, podcasts, audiobooks and the creator marketplace. Rather than preserving an existing business model, they are tasked with expanding Spotify into new forms of audio and media consumption. Together their leadership combines operational discipline with product innovation. Alex Nordström focuses on commercialization, scale and financial performance, while Gustav Söderström focuses on technology, platform capabilities and user experience. Supported by Daniel Ek’s long term strategic oversight, the structure is designed to balance experimentation with execution as Spotify evolves from a music streaming service into a broader global audio platform.

The Numbers

The first number we will look into is the return on invested capital, also known as ROIC. We want to see a 10-year history, with all numbers exceeding 10% in each year. Spotify made its IPO in 2018, so the ROIC history only reflects the period after the company became public. The numbers mainly show the transition from a company focused on building scale to one focused on monetizing it. From 2018 to 2022 the negative ROIC was largely intentional rather than a sign of a weak business. Spotify invested heavily to expand globally, improve technology, secure podcasts, and build tools for creators and advertisers. These investments increased the capital base immediately, while the financial benefits appeared years later. At the same time, music streaming carries high royalty costs that rise with usage, so strong user growth did not automatically produce profits. In several of those years operating income was minimal or negative, which naturally resulted in negative returns on invested capital, especially in 2022 when investment intensity was at its peak. The past two years represent a different stage. After building the platform, Spotify began earning more from it. Price increases led to limited subscriber churn, advertising monetization improved, and podcasts and audiobooks added higher margin revenue streams. Costs grew much more slowly because most of the infrastructure had already been built. As revenue increased faster than expenses, operating profit expanded significantly. Since invested capital grew only modestly at the same time, ROIC rose sharply above 20%. Part of this improvement should be durable because scale now works in Spotify’s favor. The company has stronger monetization, better pricing power and a higher share of revenue coming from activities beyond music streaming. However the sharp jump itself is unlikely to repeat each year. The largest improvement came from moving out of the heavy investment phase into a profitability phase. Going forward, returns are more likely to stabilize at higher levels and grow gradually rather than continue rising rapidly.

The next numbers are the book value + dividend. In my old format this was known as the equity growth rate. It was the most important of the four growth rates I used to use in my analyses, which is why I will continue to use it moving forward. As you are used to see the numbers in percentage, I have decided to share both the numbers and the percentage growth year over year. To put it simply, equity is the part of the company that belongs to its shareholders – like the portion of a house you truly own after paying off part of the mortgage. Growing equity over time means the company is becoming more valuable for its owners. So, when we track book value plus dividends, we’re essentially looking at how much value is being built for shareholders year after year. Spotify became public in 2018, so the equity history mainly shows the shift from building the business to earning money from it. In the early years the company was still investing heavily. Profits were small or negative, which meant equity sometimes grew slowly or even fell slightly. However it still increased in several years because revenue kept rising and losses were shrinking. Over time the business moved closer to profitability. The big change came in 2024 and especially 2025. Spotify finally started generating meaningful net income. Because the company does not pay dividends, profits stay inside the business and are added directly to equity. Once profits became large, equity began increasing very quickly, which explains the record high level in 2025. In simple terms, earlier years were about building the platform, while recent years are about the platform producing earnings. This trend should generally continue because profitable companies naturally grow equity over time. As long as Spotify remains profitable, equity should keep rising. However the very large jumps seen recently are unlikely to repeat every year. Those increases reflect the first years of strong profitability after a long investment phase. In the future equity will probably keep growing but at a steadier pace, more in line with annual earnings rather than dramatic jumps.

Finally, we will analyze the free cash flow. Free cash flow, in short, refers to the cash that a company generates after covering its operating expenses and capital expenditures. I use levered free cash flow margin because I believe that margins offer a better understanding of the numbers. Free cash flow yield refers to the amount of free cash flow per share that a company is expected to generate in relation to its market value per share. Spotify has produced positive free cash flow every year since its 2018 IPO. This can seem odd because the company had weak or negative profits in some of those years. The reason is that profit and cash are not the same thing. Spotify’s business naturally collects cash early. Subscribers pay upfront each month, so the company receives money before all related costs are paid. At the same time the business does not require large physical investments like factories or equipment. Most spending is royalties and operating expenses rather than heavy capital spending. Because of this structure, cash coming in has consistently been higher than cash going out, even during the years when accounting profits were low. The record free cash flow and margin in 2025 show that Spotify has moved from investment phase to earnings phase. Revenue grew, price increases did not cause many cancellations, and advertising and marketplace income improved. Meanwhile spending grew more slowly because the platform and technology had already been built. Once the fixed costs were covered, much more of each additional euro of revenue turned into cash. That is why free cash flow increased sharply and margins reached a new high. Management expects free cash flow to keep improving from here, but probably at a steadier pace. The big jump came from the first years of meaningful profitability. Future growth will likely follow revenue and margin expansion rather than another sudden step change. Spotify mainly uses its free cash flow to reinvest in the business. This includes improving the product, developing creator tools, expanding audiobooks and strengthening advertising technology in order to drive further growth. The company also keeps a strong balance sheet and repays obligations such as debt in cash. Finally, it can return money to shareholders through share buybacks, partly to offset dilution from stock compensation. The free cash flow yield is at its highest level ever. While this does not necessarily mean the shares are cheap, it suggests they are trading at their most attractive valuation so far. We will revisit valuation later in the analysis.

Debt

Another important area to investigate is debt, as we want to see whether a business has a reasonable level that could realistically be paid off within three years. To assess this, we divide total long term debt by earnings. However, Spotify has no debt. Having no debt reduces risk because the company is not obligated to make fixed payments to lenders. During weaker periods it does not have to worry about meeting interest payments or refinancing loans, which gives management more flexibility to focus on improving the business rather than protecting the balance sheet. It also means cash can be used to invest in growth, improve the product or return value to shareholders instead of servicing borrowings. In simple terms, the absence of debt makes the company more resilient and gives it more freedom to make long term decisions.

Unlock Exclusive Seeking Alpha Discounts – Level Up Your Investing With Zero Risk

If you’ve been thinking about improving your investing process, this is the easiest way to start. These offers are only available through my links, and the Premium plan even comes with a 100% risk-free 7-day trial. Try everything for a week, and if it’s not for you, just cancel. You lose nothing.

1) Seeking Alpha Premium — Try It Free for 7 Days

Access the tools I personally use every day:

• Earnings transcripts

• Stock screeners

• Deep-dive analysis

• Portfolio tracking

• Market news with context that actually matters

Special Price: $269/year (normally $299) + 7-day free trial (for new users only)

Try Premium Free for 7 Days → HERE

(Explore everything — cancel anytime during the trial and pay $0.)

2) Alpha Picks — Proven Stock Ideas

This stock-picking service has delivered +287% returns vs. the S&P 500’s +77% (July 2022–Nov 2025).Great for investors who want curated, long-term picks backed by data.

Special Price: $449/year (normally $499)

Get Alpha Picks → HERE

(Although Alpha Picks doesn’t offer a free trial, its historical outperformance means the subscription can often pay for itself quickly if results persist. For many investors, the potential return far outweighs the upfront cost).

3) Premium + Alpha Picks Bundle — Best Value

Get both services together and save $159.Perfect if you want both broad tools and high-conviction stock ideas.

Special Price: $639/year (normally $798)

Get the Bundle → HERE

(This bundle doesn’t include a free trial, but it gives you both services at a $159 discount. You get Premium’s in-depth research plus Alpha Picks’ high-performing recommendations, making it the most comprehensive option for serious investors.)

Risks

Competition is a risk for Spotify because the company operates in an industry where the product itself is easy to copy but the economics are difficult. Most streaming services offer nearly the same music catalog, so users can switch without losing access to their favorite songs. This means Spotify must constantly win on experience, price, and convenience rather than exclusivity. Many of Spotify’s main competitors are much larger technology companies such as Apple, Google through YouTube, Amazon, Meta and ByteDance. These companies do not rely on music streaming to make money. Instead, they use it to support their broader businesses. Apple sells devices, Amazon sells retail subscriptions, Google sells advertising and YouTube engagement, and Meta and TikTok compete for user attention. Because streaming is only a small part of their strategy, they can afford to offer it very cheaply or even lose money on it. That makes pricing pressure a constant risk for Spotify, which depends on streaming as its core business. Some competitors also control the hardware and software people use every day. Apple can place Apple Music directly on the iPhone and Amazon can place Amazon Music on Alexa speakers. This makes their services easier to access and reduces the need for users to actively choose Spotify. In addition, Apple and Google control the app stores where Spotify must distribute its app and can charge fees that do not apply to their own competing services. This creates a structural disadvantage because Spotify must pay costs its competitors avoid. Competition is not only about subscriptions but also about attention. Platforms like YouTube and TikTok are major discovery tools for music and podcasts, especially among younger users. If people spend more time discovering and consuming content there, Spotify risks becoming less central in the listening journey. Over time this could weaken engagement and reduce its ability to convert users into paying subscribers. Advertising is another battleground. Spotify competes with large advertising platforms such as Google, Meta and Amazon, which offer advertisers enormous reach and sophisticated targeting. Even if Spotify grows its audience, advertisers may still prefer platforms that can connect ads to shopping behavior or social media activity. This makes it harder for Spotify to capture a large share of advertising spending.

Music licensing and royalty costs are a risk for Spotify because the company does not own most of the content it distributes. Instead it must pay record la els, publishers and artists every time music is streamed. These payments historically consume roughly 70% of revenue, which means a large portion of every euro Spotify earns immediately leaves the company. This creates a different type of business compared with many digital platforms. When Spotify gains more users or listening hours, revenue rises but costs rise almost in parallel because each stream triggers a payment. As a result, growth alone does not automatically improve profitability. Even if the platform becomes much bigger, margins cannot expand dramatically unless pricing increases or royalty terms change. The negotiating balance also favors the major record labels. Universal Music Group, Sony Music and Warner Music control most of the global music catalog and Spotify cannot realistically operate without them. Licensing agreements are renegotiated periodically, and the labels have strong leverage because removing their catalogs would severely weaken Spotify’s value to users. If future negotiations lead to higher royalty rates, profitability could be pressured even if the company continues to grow. Another challenge is pricing flexibility. Spotify cannot freely raise subscription prices because higher prices may push users toward competing services that offer essentially the same music library. At the same time labels often argue that streaming prices should rise, which places Spotify between customer sensitivity and supplier demands. This limits its ability to expand margins through pricing alone. This cost structure also differs from companies that own their content. A film or series produced by a studio can generate more profit as the audience grows because the cost is largely fixed after production. In contrast, Spotify’s music costs scale continuously with usage, which effectively creates a ceiling on profitability in its core business. Spotify is trying to reduce this risk by growing podcasts, audiobooks and advertising tools where economics are more favorable and where it has more control over monetization. However music streaming remains the foundation of the platform and still represents the majority of listening time. As long as the business relies heavily on third party music catalogs, royalty payments will remain a structural constraint on long term profitability.

Macroeconomic conditions are a risk for Spotify because both of its main revenue sources depend on consumer confidence and business spending. When the overall economy weakens, people and companies tend to reduce non essential expenses, and audio streaming is affected from two directions at the same time. Advertising is usually the first area impacted. Spotify earns part of its revenue from ads shown to free users and podcast listeners. During economic slowdowns companies often cut marketing budgets to protect cash, and advertising spending can fall quickly even if user engagement stays high. This means Spotify can experience lower revenue without any change in how much people actually use the service. Since the advertising segment is also an important part of future margin expansion, weaker ad demand can slow profitability improvements. Subscriptions are more stable but still exposed. Spotify Premium is relatively inexpensive, yet it remains a discretionary purchase. In tougher economic periods households often review recurring payments and remove smaller services they can live without. Some users may cancel, while others downgrade to the free tier. Even small increases in churn matter because Spotify relies on scale to improve margins. Slower subscriber growth delays operating leverage and reduces the pace at which profits expand. Inflation can also create pressure from the cost side. Higher wages, technology expenses and other operating costs may rise faster than Spotify can raise prices. The company cannot easily pass all cost increases to customers because price sensitivity and competition limit how aggressively it can adjust subscription pricing. Currency fluctuations can further affect results since Spotify operates globally and reports in euros while generating revenue in many local currencies. Macroeconomic weakness therefore affects Spotify in multiple ways at once. Advertising demand may fall, subscriber growth may slow, and costs may rise, all of which can delay margin expansion. The business model remains sound over the long term, but economic downturns can temporarily interrupt growth and profitability improvements.

Reasons to invest

Expanding into new products is a reason to invest in Spotify. The company is gradually moving from being only a music streaming service to becoming a broader platform for audio and creator media. This matters because the economics of music alone are limited, while additional formats can improve engagement and profitability at the same time.. Early signs from trials in markets like the U.K. are encouraging, and management emphasizes that Spotify’s platform, where users already consume a mix of entertainment and informational content, is a natural home for educational audio experiences. Podcasts were the first step in this transition. Unlike music, where Spotify pays large royalties for every stream, podcasts allow the company to control advertising and distribution more directly. After several years of heavy investment, the podcast segment is now approaching profitability and advertising tools are improving monetization across both large and small shows. Video podcasts are an extension of this strategy. As more podcasts include video, users spend more time inside the platform and Spotify gains more valuable advertising space. Higher engagement and better advertising opportunities both support long term revenue growth. Audiobooks represent another important opportunity. By including audiobook listening hours in the subscription rather than selling titles individually, Spotify lowers the barrier for users to try the format. This expands the audience and introduces new listening habits without requiring customers to subscribe to a separate service. Publishers have already reported increased listening from Spotify users, suggesting the platform can grow the overall market rather than just take share. Over time, larger scale could also improve the economics of audiobook distribution in a similar way to podcasts. These additions also strengthen customer retention. A user who listens to music, follows podcasts, watches video podcasts and consumes audiobooks in one place is less likely to switch services. The platform becomes part of daily routines rather than a single purpose app. This increases the value of each subscriber and makes pricing increases easier to sustain. Longer term, Spotify is positioning itself as a general media companion rather than only a music library. The goal is to connect creators and audiences across multiple content types and capture a larger share of listening and viewing time. If successful, this broadens revenue sources beyond music and reduces dependence on royalty heavy streaming. The expansion into new formats therefore supports both growth and margin improvement.

New technology is a reason to invest in Spotify. The company has repeatedly grown during major technological shifts, and its business model tends to improve when new ways of consuming media appear. The original rise of cheap broadband enabled streaming, smartphones made music mobile, and personalization algorithms increased engagement. Each wave increased usage rather than replacing the platform, because Spotify adapted early and built new features around the change. AI is the next major shift and Spotify is already embedding it into the core product. Features such as the AI DJ and prompted playlists allow users to interact with the service using natural language instead of menus. Instead of searching for songs manually, listeners can describe a mood, situation or activity and the platform generates a personalized experience. This moves Spotify from a passive library to an interactive companion and increases the amount of time people spend on the app. More time spent leads to stronger loyalty and better monetization. AI also strengthens Spotify’s data advantage. The company is building a unique dataset that connects language, mood and taste to listening behavior across hundreds of millions of users. Musical preference is subjective, so this type of data cannot easily be replicated by generic artificial intelligence models trained only on text. The more people use these features, the more the system learns about individual taste, which further improves recommendations. This creates a feedback loop where the product improves with usage. The technology also helps creators. AI tools make it easier for artists to produce content and interact with fans, which increases the amount of music and audio available on the platform. More content tends to attract more listeners, and the cultural moment where music becomes popular often happens where the largest audience already exists. That dynamic reinforces Spotify’s role as the main distribution hub rather than weakening it.

Emerging markets is a reason to invest in Spotify because much of the world is still early in the shift from offline listening and piracy toward paid streaming. In Europe and North America streaming is already mature, so growth mainly comes from price increases and modest subscriber additions. In regions such as Latin America, India, Southeast Asia and parts of Africa, the industry is still forming, which gives Spotify a long runway for expansion. The company typically follows a consistent pattern in these markets. It first focuses on engagement by offering a strong free tier, local music catalogs and culturally relevant features. As more people use the service daily, familiarity grows and a portion of users gradually convert into paying subscribers. This approach already worked in Latin America, where initial doubts about profitability faded once engagement translated into subscriber growth. Management expects similar developments in other regions over time. Demographics also matter. Many emerging countries have large and young populations that spend significant time on mobile devices. Because Spotify works across low cost smartphones and is not tied to one hardware ecosystem, it can reach users who never owned music collections or paid for downloads. In several of these markets Apple’s ecosystem penetration is low, which reduces the advantage of competing services that depend on preinstalled apps. As smartphone adoption rises and incomes grow, even small increases in willingness to pay can produce large subscriber additions due to the size of the population. Short term profitability in these regions is lower because subscription prices are adapted to local purchasing power and customer acquisition costs are higher. However, the long term opportunity is substantial. Once users adopt streaming habits and disposable income rises, revenue per user tends to improve while the platform infrastructure is already in place. That means future growth can come with improving margins rather than rising costs.

Support the Blog

I want to keep the blog free and accessible for everyone. If you enjoy the content and would like to support it, you can buy me a cup of coffee through PayPal. Every little bit helps and is truly appreciated!

Valuation

Now it is time to calculate the share price. I perform three different calculations that I learned at a Phil Town seminar. If you want to make the calculations yourself for this or other stocks, you can do so through the tools page on my website, where you have access to all three calculators for free.

The first is called the Margin of Safety price, which is calculated based on earnings per share (EPS), estimated future EPS growth, and estimated future price-to-earnings ratio (P/E). The minimum acceptable rate of return is 15%. I chose to use an EPS of 12,35, which is from the year 2025. I have selected a projected future EPS growth rate of 15%. Finbox expects EPS to grow by 17,1% over the next five years, but 15% is the highest number I use. Additionally, I have selected a projected future P/E ratio of 30, which is double the growth rate. This decision is based on Spotify's historically higher price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. Finally, our minimum acceptable rate of return has already been established at 15%. After performing the calculations, we determined the sticker price (also known as fair value or intrinsic value) to be $370,50. We want to have a margin of safety of 50%, so we will divide it by 2. This means that we want to buy Spotify at a price of $185,25 (or lower, obviously) if we use the Margin of Safety price.

The second calculation is known as the Ten Cap price. The rate of return that a company owner (or stockholder) receives on the purchase price of the company essentially represents its return on investment. The minimum annual return should be at least 10%, which I calculate as follows: The operating cash flow last year was 3.446, and capital expenditures were 72. I attempted to analyze their annual report to calculate the percentage of capital expenditures allocated to maintenance. I couldn't find it, but as a rule of thumb, you can expect that 70% of the capital expenditures will be allocated to maintenance purposes. This means that we will use 50 in our calculations. The tax provision was 14. We have 206,1 outstanding shares. Hence, the calculation will be as follows: (3.446 – 50 + 14) / 206,1 x 10 = $165,45 in Ten Cap price.

The final calculation is referred to as the Payback Time price. It is a calculation based on the free cash flow per share. With Spotify's free cash flow per share at $16,37 and a growth rate of 15%, if you want to recoup your investment in 8 years, the Payback Time price is $258,41.

Conclusion

I believe Spotify is an intriguing company with strong management. The company has built its moat through scale, engagement and data. ROIC was low in the years following its IPO because Spotify was in a heavy investment phase, but it has since improved and exceeded 20% in the past two years, a level management expects to sustain going forward. Spotify also reached record free cash flow and free cash flow margin in 2025, and these are expected to continue growing over time. Competition is a risk because most services offer the same music, making it easy for users to switch, while many competitors are large technology companies that can subsidize streaming and bundle it into broader ecosystems. Spotify therefore competes not only with other music apps but also with platforms like YouTube and TikTok for attention and with major advertising networks for marketing budgets, which can pressure growth and pricing power. Music licensing and royalty costs are another risk because Spotify does not own most of the music and must pay rights holders for every stream, consuming a large share of revenue and limiting margin expansion, while the major labels hold strong negotiating power. Macroeconomic conditions also matter since economic slowdowns can reduce advertising spending and lead some users to cancel or downgrade subscriptions, while rising costs and limited pricing flexibility can delay profitability improvements. Expanding into new products is a reason to invest because moving beyond music into podcasts, video and audiobooks improves engagement and offers better economics than traditional streaming, helping retention and diversifying revenue. New technology is also a reason to invest as Spotify has historically benefited from major technological shifts and is now using AI to deepen personalization, increase engagement and strengthen loyalty, reinforcing its role as a central hub for audio discovery. Emerging markets provide another opportunity since large and young populations are still early in adopting paid streaming, giving Spotify a long runway for growth and future profitability as incomes rise and engagement converts into subscriptions. I believe Spotify is a strong company and buying shares at the Payback Time price of $258 could be a good long term investment.

My personal goal with investing is financial freedom. It also means that to obtain that, I do different things to build my wealth. If you have some extra hours to spare each month, you can turn a few hours a week into a substantial amount of money in a few years. If you are interested to know how to do it, you can read this post.

I hope you enjoyed my analysis! While I can’t post about every company I analyze, you can stay updated on my trades by following me on Twitter. I share real-time updates whenever I buy or sell, so if you’re making your own investment decisions, be sure to follow along!

Some of the greatest investors in the world believe in karma, and to receive, you will have to give (Warren Buffett and Mohnish Pabrai are great examples). If you appreciated my analysis and want to get some good karma, I would kindly ask you to donate a bit to the Macaws. These beautiful birds are critical endangered and need your help. If you have a little to spare, please donate to the Macaws here. Even a little will make a huge difference to save these wonderful animals. Thank you.